THE POLITICS OF FEAR (From Book III: NOT IN THE STARS – A Political Novel)

The Politics of Fear is the flip side of the Politics of Strength. An autocratic or dictatorial regime can’t exist without a tool to intimidate and sow terror.

In the 15th Century, when the Ottomans tried to invade Wallachia, the prince of Wallachia, Vlad III, terrified them with his tactic of impaling his enemies and displaying them in public for their comrades to see. Some German records claimed he ordered the impalement of between 20,000 to 80,000 victims displayed in the “Forest of the Impaled” which stretched for miles.

Impaling was the thrusting of a wooden stake through the lower part of the victim’s body, anus or vagina, pushing it all the way up to the upper part while the victims were still alive, but avoiding the head so that the victim could not die immediately. History gave him the infamous nickname Vlad the Impaler. The much more powerful and larger Ottoman army of Sultan Mehmed II was horrified, shaken, and forced to withdraw.

Scaring the enemies was a common tactic. The Ottomans themselves had already practiced impaling as punishment and a tool of control. The ancient Chinese kings used the no less terrifying “Tứ Mã Phân Thây” or “Death by Tearing The Body of a Victim By Four Horses” (a horse was tied to each limb of the victim) to deal with traitors.

In modern times, impaling was too savage a tactic even for the most cruel individuals, organizations, or groups. Even the German Nazi avoided it and opted for mass gassing and systematic deprivation. But terrifying or intimidating people, was and is still favored by the bullies.

In present days’ politics, terror is practiced in the forms of blackmailing, lawsuits, prosecutions, withholding funding, and threatening retaliation. The politics of fear has warped public opinion, silenced the voice of reason and conscience, lowered the moral level below that of a civilized society, and forced ordinary people to live permanently in fear and forfeit their right to protest against and object to the political acts they consider immoral, unconstitutional, or illegal.

Fear destroys dignity.

The vicious circle – retaliation begets retaliation – will continue forever.

Unlike all other forms of political systems, fear does not have a place in a democratic society. That reason alone is enough for Democracy to be the best system for ordinary people – and the billionaires too if they can get out of their fantasy of being in control of other people’s life – that has ever been created to serve mankind. It is the best reason for ordinary people to fight for Democracy or one day, sooner or later, they will wake up by a terrifying knock on the door or be stopped in the street while walking home and never again seeing their loved ones.

People who think that they are exempt from terror in a dictatorship are seriously mistaken, because exemption is always temporary and terror, if it can be used against one person or one group will be used against all.

Remember Lavrentiy Beria, the Executioner? For years, he was the terror of the Soviet Union’s communist society including the elites under Stalin, carrying out mass arrests, interrogations, and executions. When Stalin died, he was generally thought to be the next dictator of the Soviet Union. But terror turned around to visit him and he himself was executed in 1953.

JOHN P. LE PHONG                                                                                      (This article appears on X, thelephongjournal.com, and Facebook)

THE LAW OF STRNGTH: THE STRONG DOMINATE AND THE WEAK SUBMIT

Since animals appeared on this earth, “the strong dominate the weak and the weak submit” has been the natural law until this day. It had also been the law for humans with probably a brief interruption when Thomas Jefferson issued the Declaration of Independence, which was probably the first written document declaring that all men were equal, seemingly asserting that that law was invalid: there was no divine right of kings. The Declaration and the Constitution formed the foundation of the American Democracy – in fact the foundation of many countries’ political systems – which has enabled ordinary people a say in governing their own life.

Democracy has been a political system to address the imbalance of power between the strong, the wealthy and the controllers of police power, and the ordinary people. The mass with its numbers makes up for the lack of energy due to a lack of wealth and police power. Still, such balance of power has always been in the realm of the same law, and Democracy is still trying to find a better means to enhance and protect the balance.

More than 300 years of thriving Democracy in America, and in some other places, may turn out to be a lull in the grip of the SDWS law.

Democracy was a counterforce against the law. The power of the kings was overwhelming and the populace, scattered around, did not have much. But when they came together, in the American 1776 Revolution and the French 1789 Revolution, the energy was strong enough to subvert the power of the kings and their cohorts, the privileged, and the wealthy. Democracy was a means to make ordinary people’s life safer and better.

In the Twenty First Century, immense energy, in the form of wealth and money, accumulated lopsidedly, so hugely and so fast with the wealthy and privileged getting the most of it. The balance of power is now tilted decidedly toward them, and the multitude is losing out. The law takes hold again and is enforced relentlessly and brutally. Society is again controlled and dictated by the wealthy, and the mass is again obedient servants.

That is not the only major problem for Democracy.

The backbone of Democracy, the middle class, does not seem to be worried. They say to themselves, if I am paid millions of dollars to say in writing or on broadcast media things the strong want me to say, why should I act au contraire? What does Democracy mean to me? Why do I care? When I was scratching the earth in the winter to make ends meet and the strong were frolicking in the snow on a Swiss mountain with their fur coats on, I am not idealistic, mind you, but Democracy made a lot of sense. If my job required support in terms of influence and financially, why should I betray a guy with tons of money who knocks on my door? When my stock value keeps increasing thanks to the billionaires keeping the stock market, artificial or not, at an all-time high, why should I not listen to them? What can Democracy do for me to offset the benefits the billionaires bestow on me? I, a member of the middle class, have two or three cars in the garage, my children in college, the bills paid and money left enough for a vacation or two a year, if Democracy is wounded, it is too abstract for me to be concerned. What if the strong get abusive down the line? I don’t feel like being threatened and don’t want to sacrifice my well-to-do status quo by going against the strong in anticipation of their potential abusive behavior.

What if the American Middle Class does not consider Democracy an ideal anymore because the purposes it is supposed to serve, providing a good life, safeguarding liberty with acceptable exceptions, and creating opportunities for the people to pursue happiness, are already here? What else can Democracy offer so enticing that the American Middle Class will sacrifice their status quo and fight to protect it? A political framework to prevent bullying and abuses? What if the powerful and their AIs create a world where the bullied and abused would be somebody else at somewhere else?

The MAGA U.S.A. is now run, seemingly, like a small town with a chief of police supposedly overseen by the town’s council.  The chief runs rough shots at real or perceived criminals or law violators all over town. The town’s council has so far let the chief have free rein, assuming the town “U.S.A.” has a council. He is so free to act that he does not feel obliged to give a reason or an explanation for his acts.

The most alarming aspect of the current state of American Democracy is the complete silence of the council. It did not do anything even when one of its members, a U.S. senator, was publicly tackled down on the concrete surface of the street for daring to ask one of the chief’s underlings a question. Even if the town agreed to the policy of cleaning up the town’s streets, rectifying the immigration problem, etc., the conduct of the police in carrying out the policies left much to be desired, cruel, rough, and unnecessary, the expected behavior of the bullying strong. The council said nothing.

The cruelty, roughness, and soldiers with combat gears appearing in cities across the nation are probably not unintentionally incompetent but calculated. Some fear impressed on the mind of the populace could be a good thing that pre-empt any attempt to object or protest. After more than 300 years of staying in the background honing their skills and let ordinary people run American politics, the strong, probably with the help of the best AIs money can buy, not only know how to seize power, but more importantly how to keep power – for good. Shouldn’t Democracy seek an alliance with non-MAGA billionaires with their AIs hopefully as effective as the ones possibly being used by those going against Democracy?

Many have criticized Professor Francis Fukuyama’s thesis and asked: Is Democracy really the end of history?

America is seemingly asking: Is Democracy at its end?

JOHN P. LE PHONG                                                                                      (This article appears on X, Facebook, and thelephongjournal.com)

THE EMERGING SCHEME (Excerpt from Book I – A Supreme Conspiracy, 2023)

    His task was to convince the American envoy in whatever way he could that it would be in the U.S.’s best interest to do what he was about to propose to them to do. But he had to avoid touching Mr. Maven’s wrong nerve if, in fact, Mr. Maven was not a racist.
    “In a quarter century, the world will change beyond recognition. The Arab world or, to a larger extent, the Muslim world, including Pakistan, Central Asia, Malaysia, and Indonesia, with their wealth and human resources, will be a formidable bloc. In fact, but for the colossal mistake of taking up Jihad, they could have been able to catch up with the Chinese to become as rich and as powerful.
    “The African continent has been on its own for some time, independent from and free of the Westerners’ power. They have made mistakes and are still mired in greediness, but they will grow into a strong bloc sooner or later. They will be forceful as they now understand the indignity of doing your bidding. They are proud of who they are and assertive in dealing with the Europeans and the Americans.
    “Then we have the Chinese. Right now, you are losing out to the Chinese on many fronts. Africa will be entirely in the Chinese sphere of influence in a few more decades.
    “Remember, you can no longer put a musket at those African people’s heads to get them to listen. The only way you can influence them is to show them that their interest rests with Europe and America. But the Chinese have honed their skills in that respect for thousands of years and have become the unrivaled practitioner of the art of bribery. They have more free money than any country, including, the U.S., and they know how to bribe a leader or even a nation effectively.
    “Look at the East Sea, which the Vietnamese rightly name because it is east of Vietnam (or West Sea if the Filipinos wanted to get in the naming game). They took it for themselves. The U.S. threatened them with military action. What was the outcome? Look at what it is now, their private pond. They even changed the name of the sea to the South China Sea. They know how to translate money into real power. China’s sphere of influence now encompasses all of Asia, including Central Asia, except Russia and India. They have been the primary benefactors in Africa and impressively successful in making inroads into South America.
    “The Chinese have built a remarkable alliance, not military, but monetary, financial, business, and economic. A technology alliance may not be very far. The world is no longer a battlefield for weaponry, guns, bombs, and bullets. Those things have become less and less relevant, at least in their actual use. Do you bomb Congo if it decided to give the mineral rights to the Chinese? If Afghanistan decided to ask you to leave because the Chinese money was now replacing the dollars, would you send them a Tomahawk missile with a nuclear head?”
    Maven said, “The political consensus in the U.S. is that the Chinese have been over-aggressive, even unfairly competitive. But we believe their behavior can be changed. That approach has been supported by both Republicans and Democrats because, you must admit, the Chinese have done a lot of good for the world economy. But now, many Republicans demand rectification.”
    Semenov made a mental note that, deliberately or not, Maven talked like a neutral observer, not a diehard Republican conservative. He needed to get to the point.
    “That’s right. You mention rectification because you are a Republican conservative. If the Democrats still hold power, your desire for rectification would be just a dream.
    “The European Union controlled by France and Germany, which are governed by liberals, is still driven by their dreams of open borders and globalized economy. The success of Betancourt and his cohorts would be just a flash in the pan. So, everything wholly depends on the U.S.”
Maven pushed a little, “I still do not quite understand what we are talking about here.”
    Semenov said, “We need to get together.”
    Maven asked, “You mean our two nations?”
    “Yes.”
    “I understand that you speak on Russia’s behalf that you want to improve the American Russian relation. But in the current political climate, it is almost impossible as Russia has not changed its conduct. If you were to leave Crimea and make peace with Ukraine, that would certainly improve our relationship. But I do not know if Russia entertains such thinking. I do not think the U.S. will gloss over the Crimea takeover and the Donbas conflict, regardless of which party is in power. Russia’s rapprochement with the European Union would probably have a better chance of success.”
    “It may be true. In the current political climate, Russia would not do that. Why should it not defend itself when the U.S. maintains its hostile policy against Russia? But I am talking about a solution here. I am talking about the national interest of the U.S., even its national security.”
    “What do you mean?”
    Semenov decided to be forceful, “The conservatives and the liberals in the U.S. have been fighting each other like mortal enemies. The liberals have had the upper hand. They have enacted legislation after legislation, from environmental laws to trade laws, international agreements, global trade treaties to immigration policies – all abhorred by the conservatives who are deeply worried that these laws are detrimental to your country. We share their concern. If they have not destroyed your country, you wake up one day to find it is no longer the same country.”
    “Is it not your country’s dream to see the U.S. declining?”
    “Tim, you may not believe me, but we do not want the U.S. to be weak or declining. Let me put it this way. We do not want the U.S. to be a melting pot. You know what I mean?”
    “I am not sure I do.”
    “We want your country to be a country of white people.”
Maven felt a surge of emotion but tried to control his anger, which did not escape Semenov’s keen eye. It became clear to him that Tim Maven was not a white supremacist. He was a conservative but not an extremist. He was, Semenov tried to search for the words he had read in an op/ed column, a humane conservative.
    That revelation did not change his plan. He had to touch on the subject. He had a job to do. Tim Maven was just a conduit. And he knew, as a good judge of character, that Mr. Maven would bring the whole message back to Washington unfiltered, regardless of his feelings.
    “We in Russia, especially our president, feel strongly that the world would sink into chaos if the white race were not in charge. We have been working with the Europeans for quite some time. The task has become a little easier since the ex-members of the former Soviet Union in Eastern Europe joined the European Union. Their thinking has always been closer to our thinking than Western Europe’s. They have worked hand in hand with us to convince the European Union that it is time to promote white supremacy, or we will find ourselves at the mercy of other races.
“New conservative parties have been formed in almost every country within the E.U. and doing quite well in spreading the words that white folks have to stand together if you do not want to go the way of the Dodo.”
    He sounded very confident. Maven tried to get to Semenov’s plot as soon as possible, “You must have a detailed plan that you want me to hear.”
    Semenov took his time, “As I said earlier, the U.S. and its energy are the sine qua non in our plan. Europe by itself is weak and, I may say, impotent to do anything, even to save itself. But now we find people such as Paul Bellamy and George Jenkins, who have concerns about world affairs that have deeply affected our people.”
    “You mean white?”
    “Definitely. If you draw a line from Gibraltar to Vladivostok, north of that line are white people. Undoubtedly, we will successfully form a bloc or alliance of all these people strong enough to compete with other blocs formed by China or other regional powers. In that way, our bloc will be superior to all others and the dominant force on Earth.
    “This plan needs the U.S.’s cooperation. I have told your friends in the U.S. that we want them to join us. We need you. Our research indicates that your interest coincides with ours and the Europeans’. I have the data ready so you can check and confirm. It is time for us to act and act immediately and decisively.
    “The stumbling block is the formidable liberal faction of the Democrats. You must win a majority in both Houses of Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court to overcome this hurdle and achieve our ultimate goals.”
JOHN P. LE PHONG
(This Excerpt appears on Facebook, X, and thelephongjournal.com)